Gut feeling: the quick'n dirty script case occurs far less than the
whole module case. Thus I think the benefit of automatically importing
the Prelude if the module declaration is omitted should not happen:
the Principle of Least Surprise out-weighs the small benefit to a rare
case.

Correct me if I'm wrong about my hunch that the quick'n dirty case is
rare. Even so, I have a healthy respect both for Least Surprise and a
minimal number of behaviors when it comes to compilers.

My vote would be to never automatically import the Prelude, at least
not by default.

Regarding type variable naming, a few of my more hardware minded
friends I've asked to try Haskell often tease me about the opaque type
variable names in the Prelude--it seems greater consideration of type
variable names in the Prelude might behoove new users.

On 3/27/07, Lennart Augustsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree, I think this is what we need.
Plus a decision of what names the builtin syntax refers to,
like the type of 'a'.

        -- Lennart

On Mar 26, 2007, at 23:30 , Ashley Yakeley wrote:

> Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
>> The solution is simple:
>> * If there is a "module M where" clause in the beginning of the file,
>> then it's a "proper" module and shouldn't import the Prelude.
>> * If there is no module declaration then it's a "quick'n dirty
>> script"
>> and should have the Prelude implicitly imported.
>> * Interactive interpreters should probably import the Prelude.
>> That should take of most issues.
>
> I think this is ideal. I've always thought writing "import Prelude"
> was a good idea if one wants one's module to import the Prelude.
> It's one less corner case.
>
> --
> Ashley Yakeley
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to