On Tue, 2007-05-06 at 13:05 +0200, Georg Neis wrote: > "Michael T. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The problems I'm seeing are the ugly white-on-red for underlines, the > > lack of any kind of differentiation for keywords/operators/etc. vs. > > identifiers (although some punctuation is recognized, specifically curly > > braces), comments not being noted, etc. Basically it looks like the > > Haskell is simply not being recognized at all (and, if the @saBinds@ > > thing is what I think it is, it looks like some latex isn't being > > recognized fully either).
> Same here. I've just played around and found that the following helps: > :let b:lhs_markup="none" > :e That did it, Georg. Thanks. Now to figure out how to make that happen all the time (and how to make vim automatically do syntax highlighting instead of having to manually turn it on each time I run it), then I'm back on track to regressing about 20 years of editor use. :( -- Michael T. Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (GoogleTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Never, ever, ever let systems-level engineers do human interaction design unless they have displayed a proven secondary talent in that area. Their opinion of what represents good human-computer interaction tends to be a bit off-track. (Bruce Tognazzini)
<<attachment: smiley-6.png>>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
