On Tue, 2007-05-06 at 13:05 +0200, Georg Neis wrote: > "Michael T. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The problems I'm seeing are the ugly white-on-red for underlines, the > > lack of any kind of differentiation for keywords/operators/etc. vs. > > identifiers (although some punctuation is recognized, specifically curly > > braces), comments not being noted, etc. Basically it looks like the > > Haskell is simply not being recognized at all (and, if the @saBinds@ > > thing is what I think it is, it looks like some latex isn't being > > recognized fully either). > > Same here. I've just played around and found that the following helps: > :let b:lhs_markup="none" > :e
Oops. I spoke too soon. It works ... for about a third of the file. It then loses its mind in the middle of a do-block (in a sizable chunk of code) and doesn't regain it until the next code begin/end pairing ends. So, I guess I'm back to my original question: where can I find a decent editor that can do syntax highlighting out of the box for literate Haskell? (Or, alternatively, where can I find a syntax-highlighting editor I can expand the syntax handling of on my own?) VIM is broken out of the box and if I'm going to mess around with syntax highlighting files, I'd at least like to do it in an editor I'm likely to be comfortable in. -- Michael T. Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (GoogleTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) In his errors a man is true to type. Observe the errors and you will know the man. (孔夫子)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
