Martin Lütke wrote:
Dominic Steinitz schrieb:
Look at the type of (.).(.) which should tell you how to compose functions
with more than one variable. Mind you, I don't think it improves readability.
Dominic.
Interesting function. It got a sibling: (.)(.) :: (a1 -> b -> c) -> a1
-> (a -> b) -> a -> c
Anybody knows how to intepret that? I tried to call it with (++) "t"
(++"s") "it" but suddenly got distracted.
All I know is that most of this stuff looks like ASCII art - and perhaps
I need to see a doctor...
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
