It's reasonably easy to read. But you could make it more readable. Type signatures, naming the first lambda...
On 9/25/07, Andrew Coppin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > While using Haskell, I often find myself writing convoluted > constructions such as this: > > show_system = > unlines . > zipWith > (\l ms -> > "Eq" ++ > show l ++ > ": " ++ > (concat $ intersperse " + " $ zipWith (\n x -> x ++ " x" ++ show > n) [1..] (init ms)) ++ > " = " ++ > last ms > ) > [1..] . > map (map (take 8 . show)) > > And people complain that *Perl* is bad? This function is quite obviously > absurd. I mean, it works, but can *you* figure out what it does without > running it? The question is, can anybody think of a better way to write > this function? (And more generally, functions like it.) > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
