bf3: > For me, a good reason why one should look at Haskell is because you > should NOT look at Haskell since it will change your view on programming > so much, you don't want to go back... ;-) > > But where is the great IDE Haskell deserves??? :-) Seriously, 99% of the > programmers I know don't want to look at it because when they see Emacs > or VIM, they say "what the f*ck????, I don't want to go back to the > stone age". If you want to attract more people that are inside the > "imperative-OO-with-nice-IDE-blob", create a great looking and > functional IDE. An IDE that integrates the existing tools. That shows > you graphical pictures of the graph rewriting process, potential space > leaks, profiling bottlenecks, etc. Heck, why not introduce pictures as > symbols and values, as in DrScheme. Or UNICODE fonts. or or ... Okay, > enough of that, off topic ;-)
It has been suggested we could just sit DrScheme in front of ghc/ghci. Anyone with experience who'd like to step up for this? -- Don _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe