* Simon Marlow wrote: > further sub-versions may be added after the x.y, their meaning is > package-defined. Ordering on versions is lexicographic, given multiple > versions that satisfy a dependency Cabal will pick the latest.
x.y.z should be ordered numerically, if possible. > As suggested by various people in this thread: we change the convention so > that dependencies must specify a single x.y API version, or a range of > versions with an upper bound. Cabal or Hackage can refuse to accept > packages that don't follow this convention (perhaps Hackage is a better > place to enforce it, and Cabal should just warn, I'm not sure). Ack. Hackage is a good place to reject. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
