"Hugh Perkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 10/26/07, John Meacham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Heh, the plethora of pdf papers on Haskell is part of what originally >> brought me to respect it. Something about that metafont painted cmr >> just makes me giddy as a grad student. A beautifully rendered type >> inference table is a masterful work of art. >> >> Did I mention I was a little odd? I am sure I did. >> > > http://xkcd.com/242/ > > Actually, yeah I kindof agree. It's quite interesting to see a > language developed using rigorous, formal mathematical principles.
Lest anyone think otherwise, I most thoroughly approve of Haskell relying on rigorous foundations. I just want the foundations to be easy to inspect! -- Jón Fairbairn [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
