On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 21:42 +0000, Jon Fairbairn wrote: > "Hugh Perkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On 10/26/07, John Meacham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Heh, the plethora of pdf papers on Haskell is part of what originally > >> brought me to respect it. Something about that metafont painted cmr > >> just makes me giddy as a grad student. A beautifully rendered type > >> inference table is a masterful work of art. > >> > >> Did I mention I was a little odd? I am sure I did. > >> > > > > http://xkcd.com/242/ > > > > Actually, yeah I kindof agree. It's quite interesting to see a > > language developed using rigorous, formal mathematical principles. > > Lest anyone think otherwise, I most thoroughly approve of > Haskell relying on rigorous foundations. I just want the > foundations to be easy to inspect!
It doesn't strike me that math in HTML is easier to inspect than PDF. jcc _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
