On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 11:27:11 +0200, apfelmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Cristian Baboi wrote:
How can I define a function to do the inverse operation ?
g :: String -> ( a -> b )
This time I cannot see how referential transparency will deny it.
What's the excuse now ?
The new excuse is that a better name for g is
full-fledged-compiler :: String -> (Int -> Int)
(the function returned by g better not have a polymorphic type). Which
programming language should the argument String be written in?
Cobol, what else ?
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
