On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Galchin, Vasili wrote: > 1) Is there a common assumed semantics across all of the Haskell "with" > things? withString? withData? > > 2) If the answer to 1) is yes, then does this imply some kind of > polymorphism? Couldn't "with" be "reduced" to a higher order function then > ??
The Continuation monad abstracts the idea of 'with': http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-February/038963.html _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
