Henning, Cool ...
thx, vasili On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Henning Thielemann < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Galchin, Vasili wrote: > > > 1) Is there a common assumed semantics across all of the Haskell > "with" > > things? withString? withData? > > > > 2) If the answer to 1) is yes, then does this imply some kind of > > polymorphism? Couldn't "with" be "reduced" to a higher order function > then > > ?? > > The Continuation monad abstracts the idea of 'with': > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-February/038963.html >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
