On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 3:31 AM, brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [..] > as big a problem as I imagined. My understanding is that I can satisfy > the requirements of the LGPL by dynamically linking, and that's > already happening. Is there something else to worry about? I'd be in > violation if I shipped something statically linked, but cabal doesn't > seem inclined to do that by default.
I'm not sure I understand you here. Would you clarify your words here, bearing in mind that GHC doesn't do dynamic linking of Haskell modules? Cheers, M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
