On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Don Stewart wrote: > malcolm.wallace: > > Just a small nuance to what Don wrote: > > > so opinion seems to be that LGPL licensed *Haskell > > > libaries* are unsuitable for any projects you want to ship > > > commercially, without source code. > > > > Unless you use a different compiler. > > > > Malcolm "keeping the dream of multiple implementations alive" > > And keep dividing our compiler teams' efforts, while > single-implementation languages conquer :) > > Don "thinking that compiler developer fragmentation doesn't help now > the language research is 'done'" >
I'm not at all sure I agree with you there. That said, licensing's a particularly poor reason for a separate implementation. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'In Ankh-Morpork even the shit have a street to itself... Truly this is a land of opportunity.' - Detritus, Men at Arms _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
