Manlio Perillo ha scritto:
Hi.

I'm starting to write a CSS parser with Alex and Happy.
The grammar is defined here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/grammar.html

However I have noted that there are some difference in the syntax between Alex and Flex?
What is the rationale?


One more thing.
Here: http://www.haskell.org/alex/doc/html/alex-files.html
it seems that there is an error with
macrodef  :=  @smac '=' set
           |  @rmac '=' regexp

it should be
macrodef  :=  $smac '=' set
           |  @rmac '=' regexp


Ok, this is not an error, sorry.


By the way, here is the list of differences between Alex and Flex I have found, for people interested:

1) Alex make a distinction between "character set macros" and
   "regular expression macros".
2) Alex support the
       set '#' set0
   syntax for "character set macros"
3) Alex does not support
       [_a-z0-9-]
   that must be rewritten as
       [_a-z0-9\-]
4) In Alex the order of macro definitions is important.
   A macro must be defined before it is used in another macro
   definition.
5) For reasons I still don't understand, this:
       \"([^\n\r\f\\"]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|@escape)*\"
   cause a parse error, but these are ok:
       \'([^\n\r\f\\']|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|@escape)*\'
       \"([^\n\r\f\\"]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|@escape)*
6) As with 3), these are not parsed:
       [^*]
       [^/*]
   and must be rewritten as
      [^\*]
      [^\/\*]
7) I don't understand why, but this is not parsed:
      [EMAIL PROTECTED]@nmchar*
   The -? at the beginning must be removed.

   How can I fix this?



Thanks  Manlio Perillo
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to