You can hire one Haskell programmer instead of 1,2,3... programmers in your favorite imperative language.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Arnar Birgisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:38, Dave Tapley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Usually I'll avoid then question and explain that it is a 'complete' >> language and we do have more than enough libraries to make it useful and >> productive. But I'd be keen to know if people have any anecdotes, >> ideally ones which can subsequently be twisted into an argument for >> Haskell ;) > > I would not use Haskell if I were faced with the prospect of producing > a huge system in short time (i.e. meaning I couldn't do it by myself) > and all I had was a pool of "regular" programmers that have been > trained in .NET, Java, C++, Python, <your favorite imperative > language>. > > Yes, sad - but true. I'd very much like to see this twisted to an > argument for Haskell :) > > cheers, > Arnar > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
