On 12 Feb 2009, at 1:40 am, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2009 00:46 schrieben Sie:
I suppose I should point out what seems obvious to me, which is
that one
could embed a substantial chunk of MathML (possibly all of it) in
TeX. I
mean, give it a TeX-parseable syntax.
You can convert MathML into TeX but not the other way round. How
would you
translate $a \odot b \otimes c$? It depends on the precedence of the
operators.
And the point of that is? What I suggested is the way around that
works. And the point of my suggestion was that one could have
something that could be embedded directly in a (La)TeX document
*or* processed by Haddock: no changes when copying from one
document to another means fewer new mistakes.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
