Am Freitag, 13. Februar 2009 01:30 schrieben Sie:
> On 12 Feb 2009, at 8:48 pm, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > I don’t understand this. The way which works is conversion from
> > MathML to TeX.
> > So your suggestion would be to use MathML as the source language.
> > But this is
> > obviously not what you suggest. I’m confused.
>
> It's explicit enough in the original message:
> Use "a substantial chunk of MathML"
> in "a TeX-parseable syntax".
>
> > If you want to use a subset of TeX in Haddock comments, how would
> > you render them on a webpage?
>
> I didn't say "a subset of TeX" but a subset of >>MathML<<.
>
> [explaination follows]
So you mean a language which
* directly corresponds to a subset of MathML (and is therefore easily
convertible into sensible MathML)
* is at the same time valid TeX source which can be processed by TeX based
on a few macro definitions (like \mrow)
This sounds interesting, indeed.
Best wishes,
Wolfgang
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
