I'm exactly basing on them, but they don't have at least these things: - Monad-mutable collections like MArray - Instances of something like Assoc for arrays (arrays are collections in some sense, after all) - Treatment for unboxed types (I don't know yet, whether it is needed; but why do STUArrays have special treatment then?)
It's not that I am in desperate need for these, but making the already-good collection API even better sounds like fun :) Actually, it started with me writing a monad-mutable hashtable and thinking about what its interface should be, so probably I should just upload the hashtable to hackage as is and look what comes next :) 2009/2/27 Bulat Ziganshin <[email protected]>: > Hello Eugene, > > Thursday, February 26, 2009, 10:28:13 PM, you wrote: > >> Thanks, I'll have a look at these. Treating unboxed stuff >> polymorphically is anyways very interesting and would be good to use >> in collections API that has been recently discussed (and which I >> occasionally try to continue inventing with scarce success :-/ ). > > does this mean that type classes from Edison and Container (Collection?) > libraries are not good enough or you don't checked them? > > > -- > Best regards, > Bulat mailto:[email protected] > > -- Eugene Kirpichov Web IR developer, market.yandex.ru _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
