On 2009 Mar 19, at 12:30, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
"Max" == Max Rabkin <max.rab...@gmail.com> writes:Max> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Manlio Perillo Max> <manlio_peri...@libero.it> wrote: Max> Personally, I think that there is little harm in releasing a Max> package if it does something useful in a not-totally-broken Max> way. Especially if you plan to extend it. Suppose you intend to extend it, and are not sure yet if the interface will change as a result?
Generally you indicate this by changing the minor version: 0.3.0, 0.3.1, etc. have compatible APIs, but 0.4.0 has an incompatible API. And with major version 0, API breakage is expected in new releases.
-- brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allb...@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allb...@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
