On 2009 Mar 19, at 12:39, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2009 Mar 19, at 12:30, Colin Paul Adams wrote:"Max" == Max Rabkin <max.rab...@gmail.com> writes:Max> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Manlio Perillo Max> <manlio_peri...@libero.it> wrote: Max> Personally, I think that there is little harm in releasing a Max> package if it does something useful in a not-totally-broken Max> way. Especially if you plan to extend it.Suppose you intend to extend it, and are not sure yet if the interfacewill change as a result?Generally you indicate this by changing the minor version: 0.3.0, 0.3.1, etc. have compatible APIs, but 0.4.0 has an incompatible API. And with major version 0, API breakage is expected in new releases.
Oh, and to address your question more directly: it's by getting your package out there where people will find it (i.e. on hackage, since that's where people look) that you get more eyes on it and hopefully more ideas as to how to evolve it.
-- brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allb...@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allb...@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
