Jon Fairbairn wrote: > > semi-rant warning: > > This whole badge/logo business seems to me to be an excellent example > of Parkinson's law of triviality (choosing the colour of the > bikeshed). We have a large (too large) number of variations on > relatively few themes and a really sophisticated voting system, but > no very clear idea of what they're for and no explanation (such as my > "of type Haskell" > above) of why the candidates are the way they are. > > I didn't join in much to the earlier discussion because I thought > things would work out to something sensible in the end, but it > doesn't look like that happened. Work out what the problem is before > putting the solution up for election!
I agree with this. I have voted, but as with many others I found the process very cumbersome, and I don't think it really expresses my opinions properly. I'm concerned that this process may well end up producing a outcome that's worse than the current situation but will have some aura of legitimacy because of the vote. Cheers, Ganesh =============================================================================== Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html =============================================================================== _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
