I agree... On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Neil Mitchell <ndmitch...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >> semi-rant warning: > >> > >> This whole badge/logo business seems to me to be an excellent example > >> of Parkinson's law of triviality (choosing the colour of the > >> bikeshed). We have a large (too large) number of variations on > >> relatively few themes and a really sophisticated voting system, but > >> no very clear idea of what they're for and no explanation (such as my > >> "of type Haskell" > >> above) of why the candidates are the way they are. > >> > >> I didn't join in much to the earlier discussion because I thought > >> things would work out to something sensible in the end, but it > >> doesn't look like that happened. Work out what the problem is before > >> putting the solution up for election! > > > > I agree with this. I have voted, but as with many others I found the > > process very cumbersome, and I don't think it really expresses my > > opinions > > properly. I'm concerned that this process may well end up producing a > > outcome that's worse than the current situation but will have some aura > > of legitimacy because of the vote. > > I totally agree. I haven't voted, because if I had an hour to spare > I'd much rather spend the time actually writing Haskell. I can't rank > 100's of logos, realistically anything more than about 10 and I don't > have a chance of even figuring out which is my favourite. > > Thanks > > Neil > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
