Perhaps the rumours refer to non-tagged "versions"? In
conventional non-distributed version control systems, one
might go back to the version on a specific date, while with
darcs, that only makes sense wrt a specific repo (I think?).
So you can unpull all patches after a date from your local
repo, but that doesn't mean that you get a repo that matches
someone else's repo after they perform the same procedure.
If both parties commit to a central repo, and pull all changes
via that, there is a greater chance of date-based synchronicity.
Claus
Yes. It would be fairly easy to check this in the docs, too :)
bugfact:
Okay, thanks. So the rumors about this must be incorrect?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Ketil Malde <[email protected]> wrote:
Don Stewart <[email protected]> writes:
>> Rumor goes that this is very difficult to do with Darcs. Is this
correct?
> darcs unpull
Or just cd to a different directory, and darcs get -t <version you want>?
-k
--
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
