Yes, that might be the rumor indeed, it surely sounds like it :) Darcs is really very different, so it takes a while to get used to it when coming from other systems.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Claus Reinke <[email protected]>wrote: > Perhaps the rumours refer to non-tagged "versions"? In conventional > non-distributed version control systems, one > might go back to the version on a specific date, while with > darcs, that only makes sense wrt a specific repo (I think?). > > So you can unpull all patches after a date from your local > repo, but that doesn't mean that you get a repo that matches > someone else's repo after they perform the same procedure. > If both parties commit to a central repo, and pull all changes > via that, there is a greater chance of date-based synchronicity. > > Claus > > Yes. It would be fairly easy to check this in the docs, too :) >> >> bugfact: >> >>> Okay, thanks. So the rumors about this must be incorrect? >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Ketil Malde <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Don Stewart <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>> >> Rumor goes that this is very difficult to do with Darcs. Is this >>> correct? >>> >>> > darcs unpull >>> >>> Or just cd to a different directory, and darcs get -t <version you >>> want>? >>> >>> -k >>> -- >>> If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of >>> giants >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> Haskell-Cafe mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >> >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
