On 25 Apr 2009, at 19:08, Felipe Lessa wrote:

On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:34:05AM -0400, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
You don't write lisp, do you?  Or probably it is just me.
But I would prefer to write the line as

newtype MyCoolMonad = MyCoolMonad (FirstTransformer
                                  (SecondTransformer
                                   (ThirdTransformer Whatever)))
   deriving (Functor, Monad,
             FirstClass, SecondClass, ThirdClass, SomeOtherClass)

Doubtlessly, this is better than a one-liner, and I don't write
lisp :).

Doubtfully, after reading a message from Daniel Fischer.

Also, I don't mistake the transformers as different
parameters because of the parenthesis

You should really try Lisp. In my opinion, parenthesis are a kind of noise - too small, too many.

and because they're
transformers, reading their names gives you a clue of how they
may be used.

So... you really think transformers CAN'T be parameters? You're going to be surprised.

 Whoever knows transformers expect to see this kind
of nesting.

Whoever knows Haskell - no offense - expects to see both.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to