> > - they all can use the low-level binding in this package for > OpenUSB (which is not available now, until some expert on > that library helps me do it). No need for testing, debugging, > checking for portability or proper initialization, as all that > has been taken into account.
Having OpenUSB bindings would be great - I just submitted a proposal for it on the proper reddit - but like Don, I don't see why having it in a bindings library is better than having it in a smaller package like "hsOpenUSB". If this is all about giving users some sort of quality assurance of the contained modules then perhaps a metapackage would be good or a haskell platform like project. Thomas
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
