On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Ross Paterson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Perhaps we should make some and many methods of Alternative, <* and *> > methods of Applicative and <$ a method of Functor, all with the current > definitions as defaults. (John Meacham was also asking for the first > of these.) +1 As a justification, (*>) and (>>) serve much the same purpose, and (>>) is already exposed via Monad to permit the same kinds of optimizations that an explicit override of (*>) proffers. -Edward Kmett
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
