> [snip] > Not a hack, a solution. A consistent one. Look: > > (`foldl` 0) > (`-` 2) > > Don't they look exactly the same? > [snip]
These look the same too (and *are* consistent): (f a b) (+ a b) But it's not Haskell.. IMO conflating binary minus and unary minus is not consistent. Something I wonder from time to time if it would be a good thing or not is to allow a `f g` b to mean f g a b (so map (`f g` b) as would legal too). Cheers, Thu _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
