On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Uwe Hollerbach <[email protected]> wrote: > Ouch... my condolences, but I think you're screwed. I think the .hi > files are purely interface info, and the .o files have all the info on > what to actually do (and getting to .hs files from .hi+.o is gonna be > like going from sausage to pig, in any case). If you haven't messed > with the disk, I think your best bet might be to try and undelete > files. That might be as messy as looking at the raw disk image and > trying to recover disk sectors, or possibly there are still entire > files there that are just not referenced by directory entries. Either > (or any) way, it's a bit chancy... > And this why you always, *always* use a revision-control system or at least good backups.
.hi files actually do contain some code, specifically what ghc decides can be inlined (see ghc --show-iface), but it's not the sort of code you'd get any use from. Have a look, you'll see. -- Svein Ove Aas _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
