I really get the point, and what I should have been doing. Anyways shit happens!
Thanks for the answers though. 2009/11/22 Svein Ove Aas <[email protected]> > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Uwe Hollerbach <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Ouch... my condolences, but I think you're screwed. I think the .hi > > files are purely interface info, and the .o files have all the info on > > what to actually do (and getting to .hs files from .hi+.o is gonna be > > like going from sausage to pig, in any case). If you haven't messed > > with the disk, I think your best bet might be to try and undelete > > files. That might be as messy as looking at the raw disk image and > > trying to recover disk sectors, or possibly there are still entire > > files there that are just not referenced by directory entries. Either > > (or any) way, it's a bit chancy... > > > And this why you always, *always* use a revision-control system or at > least good backups. > > .hi files actually do contain some code, specifically what ghc decides > can be inlined (see ghc --show-iface), but it's not the sort of code > you'd get any use from. Have a look, you'll see. > > -- > Svein Ove Aas > -- Ozgur Akgun
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
