dan.doel: > On Thursday 11 February 2010 8:54:15 pm Dan Doel wrote: > > On Thursday 11 February 2010 12:43:10 pm stefan kersten wrote: > > > On 10.02.10 19:03, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > > > > I'm thinking of switching the statistics library over to using vector. > > > > > > that would be even better of course! an O(0) solution, at least for me ;) > > > let me know if i can be of any help (e.g. in testing). i suppose > > > uvector-algorithms would also need to be ported to vector, then. > > > > I could do this. > > To this end, I've done a preliminary port of the library, such that all the > modules compile. I've just used safe operations so far, so it's probably a > significant decrease in performance over the 0.2 uvector-algorithms (unless > perhaps you turn off the bounds checking flag), but it's a start. It can be > gotten with: > > darcs get http://code.haskell.org/~dolio/vector-algorithms
I've ported uvector's tests to vector, and mostly got identical code, except for: * tail * zip* * empty/null I think if you find any slowdown over uvector it has to be a bug in vector. Let Roman know. -- Don _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe