On Mar 12, 2010, at 06:01 , Johannes Waldmann wrote:
in this case, something like: Data.List.Strict.fold, Data.List.Lazy.fold

Or - if we had static overloading, and strictness info in the type,
then we wouldn't need different names. Can of worms ...


Doesn't help if strictness needs to be controlled at use sites and not at the type level (which is the usual case).

--
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allb...@kf8nh.com
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allb...@ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university    KF8NH


Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to