On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Duncan Coutts <duncan.cou...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > I think it's important to be able to convert into standard or custom > formats. I've no idea if JUnit XML would make sense as the native > format. It's plausible. >
I hadn't really thought about cabal, itself, being a consumer for test results -- but I like your (Duncan's) points about defining a testing interface, and keeping it extensible. For the record: I don't think junit xml is a good choice for a native format :), but I do think it's a good format to start with simply because there are many tools that can consume it already. --Rogan > Duncan > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
