On 28 April 2010 09:24, Richard G. <richa...@richardg.name> wrote: > I think that formatted plain-text output would be much better than XML, > something that is human-readable and relatively easy to parse via machine. > Something similar to the GHC error output would work well because > developers are familiar with it.
I have previously advocated a library interface as a detailed testsuite interface (in addition to a lowest common denominator interface of stdio+exitcode). That is a test stanza in a package .cabal file would specify a module containing an entry point of the right type (like main but using a more interesting type). That way, cabal or any other tool could run the testsuite and produce results in whatever format it likes. As you suggest in your other post, it would make sense to adapt test-framework to implement the interface specified by Cabal. Duncan _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
