(before anyone tells me I should be using an Applicative style
instead, polyparse doesn't support Applicative, so I can't)
Well, polyparse may not support the Applicative class defined in
Control.Applicative, but it _does_ have an applicative interface using
other names for the same operators (namely, pure == return, (<*>) ==
apply, (<*) == discard, (<|>) = onFail).
2. Use some function of type "(Monad m) => m a -> m ()" instead of
doing
"_ <-".
This function was discussed on the libraries list in the last year or
so. I think the consensus name for it was "void". Of your 4
alternatives, I quite like this one.
Regards,
Malcolm
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
