On 10 April 2010 00:20, Neil Brown <nc...@kent.ac.uk> wrote: > The comments in that bug report actually mention "My patch does not warn on > uses of >>, only in do-notation, where the situation is more clear cut". I > take >> to be an explicit sign that the user wants to ignore the result of > the first action, whereas in do-notation it may be an accident. So I think > it was the right decision.
Ahhh, I missed that bit. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
