You might have misunderstood me. When using hint, one wants the script to be interpreted. It is interpreted when called " loadModules ["Script"] ", but if we call later " interpret *something* (as :: Something) ", the *something *can be any Haskell code, not just a function name, which means hint has also to interpret the *something*. So, IMO, a double interpretation is done when a function such as "getSymbol *functionName *(as :: FuncType)", which would simply get the function, would be sufficient. I don't know if hint/GHC API allows to do such a thing...
2010/5/8 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH <allb...@ece.cmu.edu> > On May 7, 2010, at 19:51 , Limestraël wrote: > > then *interpret "script" (as :: ScriptFun)* > > There is just the line I put in bold that bothers me. Can't we get the > action "script" more easily than by re-interpreting some code? > > > Make up your mind: you don't want to have to compile the script, but you > don't want to have to interpret the script. What exactly is supposed to be > left? > > -- > brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allb...@kf8nh.com > system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allb...@ece.cmu.edu > electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH > > >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
