"Richard O'Keefe" <o...@cs.otago.ac.nz> writes: >> it is often desirable to have the same field names >> for many records in the same module.
> I'm not sure that it is desirable to have "many records in the > same module" in the first place. One possibility might be to allow mulitple module definitions in the same file, making it easier to wrap each record in its own module without running into a Java-like forest of files. (I've proposed this before, and although I don't remember the specifics, ISTR the response being mostly negative.) -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
