On 11/11/2010 11:48 PM, John Lask wrote:
again quoting

http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/simonpj/Haskell/records.html

"Haskell lacks a serious record system. (The existing mechanism for named fields in data types was always seen as a stop-gap measure.)"

isn't it about time this changed?

Records do leave quite a bit to be desired. But does anybody actually have a concrete alternative proposal yet?

Personally I'm not really keen on TDNR; I'd prefer records that aren't so inconvenient. But I have no idea how to design that.

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to