On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 18:15 -0800, Evan Laforge wrote: > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Evan Laforge <qdun...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I've uploaded attoparsec-text and attoparsec-text-enumerator to > >> Hackage. I've written those packages late last week and asked for > > > > Very nice! I'll download this and try it out. Attoparsec has a bit > > different combinators than parsec so it'll take some rewriting, but > > it's work I'd have to do anyway to try the bytestring+attoparsec > > approach. > > Well, I tried it... and it's still slower! > > parsec2, String: (a little faster since last time since I have new > computer) > total time = 9.10 secs (455 ticks @ 20 ms) > total alloc = 2,295,837,512 bytes (excludes profiling > overheads) > > attoparsec-text, Data.Text: > total time = 14.72 secs (736 ticks @ 20 ms) > total alloc = 2,797,672,844 bytes (excludes profiling > overheads)
Sorry for asking but just for reference - what is performance of nanoparsec on your machine in this test? Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
