On 7 February 2011 10:16, Jimbo Massive <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's often struck me that, this information is clearly part of the > interface to a function, given that correct operation of calls to that > function may depend on it, yet we (implicitly) pretend that it's not (by > rarely documenting it). > > Would it not be both incredibly useful and possible to automatically > document information of this sort using tools like haddock? Interesting point, but excepting that its adding more complexity Haskell type system, the Clean way of putting strictness information into the type system seems preferable don't you think? _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
