On , Ryan Ingram <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Sam. I don't know much about the performance problems you are
seeing, but I think your solution is more cleanly implemented just
under the event level with futures.

I think the reactive function you want has a type like this:

stateMachine :: s -> (a -> s -> s) -> (s -> Future (b, s)) -> Event a -> Event b


Hi Ryan.

I will have to study futures, and your code, for a while before I can give an intelligent response,
but I really appreciate the suggestion. I will have a look at futures next.

Many thanks,
Sam
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to