On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Gregory Collins <[email protected]>wrote:

> Based on the description it looks like you could be looking for:
>
>    http://hackage.haskell.org/package/simple-atom
>
> G
>
>
Coincidentally, I put up a question at stackoverflow for this just yesterday
-
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6164260/why-doesnt-haskell-have-symbols-a-la-ruby-atoms-a-la-erlang
.

Why doesn't Haskell have built in syntactic sugar for atoms?

-- Anupam
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to