On 30 May 2011 05:27, Anupam Jain <[email protected]> wrote: > Why doesn't Haskell have built in syntactic sugar for atoms?
Because they don't have a functional interpretation? (i.e. they're really a hack) _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
