On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:19:31 +0300, Guy <guytsalmave...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On 03/06/2011 12:01, Malcolm Wallace wrote: > > I believe the motivating example that persuaded the Language Committee to > > allow these symbols was > > --> > > which is not of course used anywhere in the standard libraries, but is an > > extremely nice symbol to have available in user code. > > Seeing as no library actually defines such a symbol, is it worth forcing an > extra space into comments? [..]
That's not true, xmonad[0] for example defines a -->-operator; and I would find making exceptions for --| and --^ very inconsistent and annoying. [0] http://xmonad.org/xmonad-docs/xmonad/XMonad-ManageHook.html#v%3A--%3E
pgp8FyrB33uh7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
