Don't forget that some languages use <> to mean "different" (as if "different" meant always "superior or inferior"...), so some beginners might get confused.
I personally often define the alias: (<+>) = mappend 2011/7/24 Maciej Wos <[email protected]> > Personally, I have nothing against mempty (although I agree that mid makes > more sense), but I don't like mappend at all. I wonder what happened to the > idea of using <> instead of mappend (that's what I always do). I think > > a <> b <> c > > looks so much better than > > a `mappend` b `mappend` c > > and it solves the name problem altogether. > > -- Maciej > On Jul 24, 2011 3:42 AM, "KC" <[email protected]> wrote: > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
