Yes, this has sort-of been agreed upon in a GHC ticket about a year ago: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3339
I had a patch in Darcs, but then came the switch to Git. I ported it to Git, but didn't iron out all the issues. That was quite a while ago so it's currently a bit bitrotten. I don't think it's enough time to get it into 7.2, but since that's largely an unstable release, it wouldn't hurt until 7.4. I'll probably work on it at CamHac in a few weeks. On 24 July 2011 13:14, Maciej Wos <[email protected]> wrote: > Personally, I have nothing against mempty (although I agree that mid makes > more sense), but I don't like mappend at all. I wonder what happened to the > idea of using <> instead of mappend (that's what I always do). I think > > a <> b <> c > > looks so much better than > > a `mappend` b `mappend` c > > and it solves the name problem altogether. > > -- Maciej > > On Jul 24, 2011 3:42 AM, "KC" <[email protected]> wrote: > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > -- Push the envelope. Watch it bend. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
