Hi Alexander,
Thank you for the kind words.
I've checked the color contrast and it seems to range between 3.2 and
4.7 with a mean contrast at 4.0, which borders on problematic (the
recommendation is 4.5), but doesn't seem terribly inaccessible,
especially since it's only used on a handful of links and not the entire
text.
I will add this to my list of "along the way" improvements for a final
run, trying to bump the contrast ratio to a more steady 4.5+.
Since you appear to be keen on accessibility: If you have specific
issues that you would like to raise to and, preferably, advice on how to
improve them, I'm all ears. I'm pointing that out because "doesn't
/look/ accessible" (my emphasis) doesn't give me that much to work with
and I hope it's obvious that following WCAG2.0 "as strictly as possible"
is not feasible for a volunteer.
While I agree that accessibility is a very important aspect to pay
attention to, I would appreciate not getting too lost in details like
this at this stage in the process. The intent of my PR is to replace the
current site design, not iron out every possible issue with it (similar
contrast concerns are valid for the current site, for example the
community section - that we fixed... by removing it - goes as low as 2.3
in terms of contrast) and certainly not attain a "universal design"
(which, admittedly, I'm not sure I fully understand the meaning of).
That being said, I appreciate that my PR apparently continues to foster
a level of bikeshedding (with occasional compliments thrown in) that
seems to suggest that there isn't much objection to it ;-) So - since my
time is limited, I hope we can move ahead with the PR some time soon and
move the more detailed analysis to followup tickets.
best regards,
David
On 30.05.2016 10:56, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
The pink on purple doesn't look accessible. I.e. there is too low
contrast. Please try to make sure WCAG 2.0 is adhered to as strictly
as possible in order to ensure universal design that doesn't
discriminate against people with disabilities.
Thanks to David for working on this!
- --
Alexander
alexan...@plaimi.net
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=vaUM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Haskell-community mailing list
Haskell-community@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community
_______________________________________________
Haskell-community mailing list
Haskell-community@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community
