Thanks, Gershom,
I've added another commit and everything is good to go from my end.
best regards,
David
On 31.05.2016 01:14, Gershom B wrote:
David -- that sounds about right to me (in terms of people liking the
broad strokes and raising issues that are important but don't need to
be in scope for this initial phase).
If you have anything else you want to do first, let me know, otherwise
I'll go ahead and accept the pull and, barring any further discussion
that stands in the way, redeploy sometime this week.
We can then proceed in a lot of directions from there :-)
Sound good all?
Cheers,
Gershom
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 6:04 PM, David Deutsch <sk...@skore.de> wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Thank you for the kind words.
I've checked the color contrast and it seems to range between 3.2 and 4.7
with a mean contrast at 4.0, which borders on problematic (the
recommendation is 4.5), but doesn't seem terribly inaccessible, especially
since it's only used on a handful of links and not the entire text.
I will add this to my list of "along the way" improvements for a final run,
trying to bump the contrast ratio to a more steady 4.5+.
Since you appear to be keen on accessibility: If you have specific issues
that you would like to raise to and, preferably, advice on how to improve
them, I'm all ears. I'm pointing that out because "doesn't /look/
accessible" (my emphasis) doesn't give me that much to work with and I hope
it's obvious that following WCAG2.0 "as strictly as possible" is not
feasible for a volunteer.
While I agree that accessibility is a very important aspect to pay attention
to, I would appreciate not getting too lost in details like this at this
stage in the process. The intent of my PR is to replace the current site
design, not iron out every possible issue with it (similar contrast concerns
are valid for the current site, for example the community section - that we
fixed... by removing it - goes as low as 2.3 in terms of contrast) and
certainly not attain a "universal design" (which, admittedly, I'm not sure I
fully understand the meaning of).
That being said, I appreciate that my PR apparently continues to foster a
level of bikeshedding (with occasional compliments thrown in) that seems to
suggest that there isn't much objection to it ;-) So - since my time is
limited, I hope we can move ahead with the PR some time soon and move the
more detailed analysis to followup tickets.
best regards,
David
On 30.05.2016 10:56, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
The pink on purple doesn't look accessible. I.e. there is too low
contrast. Please try to make sure WCAG 2.0 is adhered to as strictly
as possible in order to ensure universal design that doesn't
discriminate against people with disabilities.
Thanks to David for working on this!
- -- Alexander
alexan...@plaimi.net
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=vaUM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Haskell-community mailing list
Haskell-community@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community
_______________________________________________
Haskell-community mailing list
Haskell-community@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community
_______________________________________________
Haskell-community mailing list
Haskell-community@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community
